020 7792 5649

Hi, How Can We Help You?

English Judges Will Enforce Arbitrators’ Decisions To The Hilt

The below case is a prime example of why ignoring a court order is at your peril.  People get sent to prison for ignoring court orders, this is contempt of court.  

In the below case, in Arbitration, an award was made against company B.  The Director of Company B ignored the award and subsequent court orders and disclosure orders.

The result?  2 years in prison.  

It is pointless ignoring a court order. Once such an order has been made, there is literally no getting away from the fact you have to adhere to it.  If you do not, you can and probably will, go to prison.

One of the principal reasons why commercial arbitrators so often sit in London is that the English courts are well known for enforcing their decisions to the hilt. In one case that proved the point, a businessman who utterly ignored an arbitration award and a string of court orders was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment for his defiance.

Company A, a producer of agricultural goods, had obtained a $61,239 arbitration award against a shipping company (company B) that was under the businessman’s control. No attempt was made to satisfy the award and, after company A launched enforcement proceedings, orders were made by the High Court freezing company B’s assets and requiring disclosure of financial information.

There had been no compliance with any of those orders and neither company B nor the businessman had responded to a number of emails that had warned them of the seriousness of the matter. The Court noted that it was as if the orders and emails had fallen into a void and that the businessman appeared to believe that, so long as he stayed outside the borders of the UK, he would evade punishment.

There had been no excuse proffered by company B or the businessman and the Court found that the latter’s conduct amounted to a wilful interference with the administration of justice. In the circumstances, a prison sentence close to the two-year maximum that could be imposed for contempt was justified.

Get legal advice

Complete the form below and we will be in touch to arrange a consultation.

Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
lrs logo 2016MLA 2017 18 Shortlisted 2

Want Selachii’s help?

Call us now

020 7792 5649

arrange a consultation


MLA 2017 18 Shortlisted 2