The case below interests me. Not so much that computer software has been defined as goods by a court, but why the issue of the agent being in contact with a competitor was not explored further. The court simply stated
Freezing Orders are an extremely powerful legal tool. The court’s, because of the consequences of such an order, have to ensure that they only make the order if there is a need to so so. The order is not meant
The law, as is often the case, tends to be reactive, not proactive. This actually makes sense. There would be no need to legislate for a ‘what if’ situation. If legislators were proactive and legislated in such a fashion then
The case below shows the difficulties of making an application to set aside a judgment. Even if there are good prospects of success in the defence of a claim, the applicant needs to act swiftly in the filing of the
There is an old adage that no one ever got sacked for choosing IBM. Traditionally that was probably true and it’s definitely a sentiment has been mirrored by those looking to purchase legal services. Being big was taken as a